π UPDATE β July 24, 2026
Analyst Gary Black has put hard numbers to the FSD transparency debate, publishing a side-by-side comparison that underscores just how wide the gap between Tesla and Waymo remains in deployed, revenue-generating autonomy. Black argues that paid unsupervised rides per week β not fleet size or miles driven β is the metric that ultimately drives earnings and cash flow in the autonomous sector.
| Metric | Waymo | Tesla |
|---|---|---|
| Unsupervised AVs (no safety monitor) | 3,500 | ~40 |
| Paid unsupervised rides/week | 500,000 | ~4,000 |
The figures β sourced from Black's July 24 post β show Waymo operating roughly 87Γ more unsupervised vehicles and generating approximately 125Γ more paid rides per week than Tesla's nascent robotaxi program. This data adds quantitative weight to the analyst criticism already pressuring TSLA shares.
Tesla shares dropped 7% Wednesday morning, pushing the stock to a 23% year-to-date loss at a time when the Nasdaq 100 is up 15% over the same period. The selloff followed Tuesday's earnings call, and at least one prominent market analyst argues Tesla's management made the hole deeper by staying silent on the metrics that matter most right now.
Gary Black, a well-known Tesla investor and analyst, called out management directly for not disclosing basic unsupervised autonomy data during the call. His specific ask: how many unsupervised autonomous vehicles are currently operating without safety operators present. That single figure, he suggested, would go a long way toward helping investors gauge whether Tesla's robotaxi ambitions are translating into real-world scale β or still living on a slide deck.
The timing is hard to ignore. Tesla's autonomous driving story is supposed to be the central bull case for the stock at this valuation. When an earnings call passes without concrete progress metrics on that front, the market fills the silence with skepticism. A 7% single-day drop is the price of that ambiguity.
Whether management chose to withhold the data, doesn't yet have numbers worth sharing, or simply misjudged what investors needed to hear, the result is the same: a credibility gap that the next quarterly call will need to close.
Related Gear
Gear up your Tesla with tested, custom-fit BASENOR accessories β shop Tesla accessories β
Sources & reporting notes
The links below identify the material source records used for this report.
- @garyblack00 on X (2026-07-23T12:40:12.000Z) β Direct source
Source links are preserved as published or accessed. See our editorial standards and corrections policy.
The BASENOR Editorial Desk covers Tesla, SpaceX, and related technology, curating reporting from primary sources β official accounts, regulatory filings, and software release data. Every article passes source-record and fact-checking review before publication. About the newsroom.
This report was curated by the BASENOR Editorial Desk from the sources listed above. Read our editorial standards or email editorial@basenor.com to report an error.
